-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chat: Evaluate prompt changes for smart apply #16
Open
umpox
wants to merge
9
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
tr/chat-smart-apply-eval
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+13,341
−5,833
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
75dfd6c
Cody: Chat eval results with smart apply
umpox 0f2e18f
Chat Smart Apply Eval
umpox 44d1202
update
umpox a8fb691
update for anthropic change
umpox 67403cc
updated prompt eval
umpox 6226b55
csvs
umpox 1f757a6
re-run eval
umpox 0ac9312
update prompt
umpox ff4763a
eval
umpox File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
1,390 changes: 1,159 additions & 231 deletions
1,390
output/chat/claude-3-sonnet/input/chat/cody-bench.csv
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did anything change here besides your prompt? Like how we pass context? Compared to before, it looks like we're much more likely to return quoted code snippets in the response. This response now contains code snippets, as well as several subsequent ones. (That's not necessarily bad, just trying to understand!)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is because we're including this at the end of a transcript, kinda similar to how we append "Answer positively without apologizing."
I'm experimenting with moving this to the system prompt here: sourcegraph/cody#5290
I'll run a few more evals and update this branch
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So I've updated the prompt and eval here and, although this response is pretty similar, I think it's much better at providing code snippets when they are relevant.
There were a bunch of issues with the previous prompt where the LLM would prioritise returning a code snippet unnecessarily, it seems much better now (still going through the diff though)