Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Gramplet: DNA matches #578

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: maintenance/gramps51
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RampantSpirit
Copy link

Hey, I made this Gramplet for personal use but thought others may find it useful as well, so here it is.

DNAMatches

DNA Matches will list the active person's DNA matches including information about their relationship, cMs, number of segments, largest segment and sources. It is designed to complement the DNA Segment Map and also works with the Sync Associations gramplet, but can be used without them.

Information is gathered from Notes in Associations of type "DNA" between persons, same as with the DNA Segment Map (exact same format). However, there is also an alternative format for websites that don't have chromosome browsers such as Ancestry. This takes the form of a note with a single line specifying shared DNA, shared segments and the largest segment, in that order, separated by tabs or commas, like so:

168,5,68

You can see one Ancestry match in the attached screenshot above to give you an idea.

This initial version also comes with a Slovak translation by myself as I am Slovak. 😄

Btw, I did spin this off from the DNA Segment Map initially so I left the original developers' credits in the files. Hope that's ok.

Let me know if there are any issues!

@GaryGriffin
Copy link
Member

The help_url specified does not exist.

Should this be a report instead of a gramplet? The output is not actionable (clickable), so feels more like a report.

Should this be moved to 5.2 (from gramps51)? Or in both branches?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants