Suggest renaming the repo to FireDBG #31
Closed
peter-lyons-kehl
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
Closing & agreeing to @tyt2y3's answer. Copying it from https://old.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/18fz013/introducing_firedbg_a_time_travel_visual_debugger/kg7ym2w/: (and also the Rust foundation does not like project names like “firedbg-rust”) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Thank you & Wow. There has been some time travel debugger: Omni* (Omniscient?*) for JVM, but its GUI was a pain (non-intuitive, or too flexible so one got lost in it fast - I've tried...). However, FireDBG's GUI seems much more obvious & practical.
The word "for" in "FireDBG for Rust" doesn't do FireDBG justice. The first impression/interpretation/assumption is: "ported to/compatible/integrated with Rust".
If it's not too late, I'd even suggest renaming the GitHub repo to just "FireDBG" (GitHub WILL automatically redirect old URLs).
Otherwise, suggest adding a header at/near the very top or README.md and in the repo description, saying that this is
(Also copied to https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/18fz013/introducing_firedbg_a_time_travel_visual_debugger.)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions