You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Just today, I was greeted by a nasty message from GCC 13.2 that the <chrono> header (and thus everything in std::chrono) is not available in a freestanding implementation.
While that is true, it has worked in the past. Would it make sense to add an etl::duration? It's the part of it that previously worked, and the one most likely to be missed. An alternative option would be to encourage the use of a units library (either generally, or a specific one).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just today, I was greeted by a nasty message from GCC 13.2 that the
<chrono>
header (and thus everything instd::chrono
) is not available in a freestanding implementation.While that is true, it has worked in the past. Would it make sense to add an
etl::duration
? It's the part of it that previously worked, and the one most likely to be missed. An alternative option would be to encourage the use of a units library (either generally, or a specific one).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: